So it seems that Dave Winer thinks that my friend (though some may argue otherwise)
brad and the rest of us shouldn't be using the term "social graph". "Social Graph" is a horrible term when dealing with non-geeks and even for geeks it elicits arguments about what type of graph it actually is.
So yes Dave, we are all talking about "social networks"! That said, I do think there is value in respecting Zuckerburg's prior uses of the phrase. So what about a compromise, "graph" for geeks and "network" for everyone else?
So yes Dave, we are all talking about "social networks"! That said, I do think there is value in respecting Zuckerburg's prior uses of the phrase. So what about a compromise, "graph" for geeks and "network" for everyone else?


Comments
Separate from all that I don't know that either of those terms are great for describing to people what we want to open or giving them much of an idea of the potential of it.
PS: Dave Winer is mad.